Home » HR practices » Professional development » Legal developments » National legislation » France : the employee that usually executes his work in another Member State cannot submit a case to the Labour Court of his own place of residence France : the employee that usually executes his work in another Member State cannot submit a case to the Labour Court of his own place of residence The regulation 44/2001 of December 22nd 2000 concerning the judicial competence, the regognition and exectution of orders for civil and commercial matter grants the employee with an advantage in comparision with the employer : while the latter can only submit a case to the salaried worker's place of residence, the employee can either refer the case to the employer's place of recidence (registered office) or his usual working place's one. However, this option granted to the salried worker does not allow him to bring the lawsuit before the competent court of his own place of residence. (Ref 06543) Through . Published on 01 June 2006 Ă 5h53 - Update on 26 March 2013 Ă 13h45 Resources These are asymmetrical dispute’s rules that the Court of Cassastion reminds of in a lawsuit where the employee, living in France, had submitted the case to the Labour Court in Voiron, whereas his employer was set up in Luxemburg and that the work was done in this country.… Need more info ? Contact mind's on-demand study service Which service do you want to contact :WritingCommercial serviceTechnical SupportFirst name Last name Organization Function email* Object of the message Your messageRGPD J’accepte la politique de confidentialitĂ©.CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Essentials Les dernières publications Supporting parenthood in the workplace: a win-win strategy Supporting employee carers: a CSR challenge Analyzes Les dernières publications Paternity leave: data observations from 41 countries EU: during H1 2022 five EU Member States have raised their minimum salary levels
